Mary and Martha by Minerva Teichert
My
impression is that the leaders of the church have just started to soften a bit
towards feminist ideas, after the perception in the 1980s and 90s that
feminists and intellectuals were enemies of the church (as Elder Packer put
it). The leaders listened to the heartfelt and well written letters and let a
woman pray in conference. Women missionaries have been given more leadership
roles, and the responsibilities of mission presidents’ wives have increased. These
have been small steps but in the right direction.
I
thought the “wear pants to church day” was a good awareness event. Even with
such a mild goal regarding our own personal dressing choices and helping all people feel accepted at church, though, it got a
lot of unwarranted negative backlash. I saw messages from people on both sides
of the issue on my Facebook feed. Those who felt strongly enough to write
against it did so in apocalyptic terms.
The same thing has happened with the Ordain Women movement, which is less mild. The following word cloud from Ordain Women posts really sums it up well, I think: the size of each word in the cloud is proportional to how often it turned up in comments either for or against. Which side is being reasonable, and which seems to be extremist?
comments from the people who agree with Ordain Women
|
comments from the people who don’t agree with Ordain Women
|
Major change and negative media attention (I think) seem to upset the leaders, at whose
discretion any change has to come. So what would be more modest goals to enlarge
women’s role in the church? This article most closely says what I feel right
now would be positive, achievable change.
Here
is an excellent article defending the Ordain Women movement:
Here
is an excellent blog post my friend Genevieve wrote on the subject:
The word clouds are really telling.
ReplyDelete